Menu
In the beginning of this SARS-CoV-2 debacle, when there was espoused only “one science” approved and presented by the media. It took a bit of digging to uncover previous studies, monitor the adverse events, and find other scientific hypotheses. Now we can see clearly that there is a deeper, more robust, science that is contradicting the mainstream. However, we still hear the mantra “follow the science!” “you are a denier of science!” and as Joseph Mengele 2.0, Anthony Fauci so famously put it, “if you are against me, you are against science!” …our eyes still water at that one.
When a pathetic little weasel and known animal torturer threatens us, we immediately know that the right thing to do is the exact opposite of what he is saying and look more deeply into the actual science. Particularly when Nobel prize-winning immunologist and PCR Inventor Kary Mullis explicitly warned that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test was strictly for research and not diagnostics. He explained in detail that the PCR test is an extremely non-specific test that can yield a lot of false positives (up to 90%). He also called out Fauci as a “clueless liar” who is following an agenda for his masters. This was well before ‘Covid’ when ‘HIV’ (the ‘Covid’ rehearsal) was the manufactured scare story. Mullis mysteriously died on 7 August 2019.
“It’s no surprise that modern civilisation, intellectually based on a fool’s version of ‘science,’ has built science as a new religion, with all the restrictions that organised religions have enforced… Talking news heads are feeding the population fast-food COVID science – a manufactured product consisting of synthetic bullshit about cases, deaths, the virus, the vaccine. It’s cardboard. And no dissenters allowed.”
— Jon Rappoport
In the middle-ages, scientists were absolutely convinced that disease came from bad smells. Only when that idea was challenged by scientists who discovered microbes, could we then go on to discover that disease was caused by toxins, parasites, and bacteria. Had they not challenged the orthodoxy, we would still be living in the dark ages and most people would be dying well before the age of forty. Freedom of speech in the middle ages was essential just as it is now. Together with free speech, transparency is key to good science. Freedom of speech and transparency are ideal bedfellows: While freedom of speech allows us to challenge, learn and criticise, transparency allows us to know we are getting all the information we need in order to make that challenge. Without transparency, we cannot form new ideas and find new answers to complex problems. Yet, today we are grooming the science to fit the narrative. The research and ideas that the media and scientific journals are selecting are cherry-picked. Personal interest and financial gain are the motive and freedom of speech has been gagged.
“If liberty means anything at all it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
– George Orwell
We have analysed and decoded this long-running, persistent, and egregious event called “COVID.” While a daunting task, there is some unique allure that draws us in and, like most people it provokes us and intensifies our emotional response – unfortunately not in a positive way. Most human beings are naturally sensation-seeking. Essentially, it may be an innate trait to desire novel experiences. Perhaps it is our brains that motivate us to want to cultivate new and unfamiliar circumstances, despite the fear and anxiety that typically accompanies them. This drive for excitement resides much deeper than our brains; it’s wired into the very consciousness that informs us – in order to provide opportunities for growth and evolution. In this way, the spell-binding and mind-blinding phenomenon we have observed since this operation began may be summed up in one word, excitement.
The masses are highly excited by this induced trauma. In fact, we have reason to believe that the hypnotised populace are being pulsed with external electromagnetic fields (through computer monitors, smart devices, and televisions) aimed to stimulate and accentuate this excitation and sensory resonance. Think about this for a moment: Would you agree that most people in this country live fairly dull and repetitive lives? Most of us go from day to day, attending to our jobs (many living paycheque to paycheque, and rent payment to rent payment) and attending to our daily tasks on our own, with family, and/or friends. For the most part, it’s not really all that stimulating in every moment. Fast forward to March 2020, when “lockdown” occurred. Even if the lockdown provoked fear in most people (leading them to a questionable response ostensibly to an imaginary pathogen), it still seemed new and different, and something to focus on… particularly given that it was front and centre on every channel and media outlet 24/7. It got the juices flowing, so to speak – an adrenaline rush.
“Science can flourish only in an atmosphere of free speech.”
– Albert Einstein
The common thread woven throughout this operation can also be summed up in another word: science, or rather two words: weaponised science. If we combine excitement + science we end up arriving at the cult-like phenomenon called Scientism.
Merriam-Webster has this definition of Scientism:
1 : methods and attitudes typical of or attributed to the natural scientist
2 : an exaggerated trust in the efficacy of the methods of natural science applied to all areas of investigation (as in philosophy, the social sciences, and the humanities)
Exaggerated trust inherently implies a pattern of excitement, as well as over-reliance on scientific results. What this also reveals is that scientists do not present facts, but rather, theories to be proven. Any science geek will tell you that this is what makes science so much fun! Science is always changing, and is rarely ever constant. What may seem valid one day, may be nullified another day. What makes science so invigorating is the incessant inquiry – leading to un-foregone conclusions. By its very nature, science can never be settled.
Here’s the thing: the main distinction between Scientism and other religions, is that Scientism seems to leave NO room for dissent; whereas in many religions, there is subtle and sometimes even significant dissent that is not only permitted, but possibly encouraged. It’s no secret that interest (AKA excitement) and trust (sometimes “blind”) in standard religions has waned in recent years. Perhaps this has been accomplished by design? So, it seems this is a ripe time to attract many into a new quasi-religion. And what is the reductionist beast system offering to the common folk who need respite from the spiking of their cortisol levels, due to living in this manufactured stress bombardment? It’s become abundantly clear – “Keep Calm and Trust the Science.”
“The public has a distorted view of science because children are taught in school that science is a
collection of firmly established truths. In fact, science is not a collection of truths.
It is a continuing exploration of mysteries.”
―
Speaking of Keep Calm memes – including travel mugs that say “Keep Calm and Trust the Virologist” – we found it curious that they are often presented with the symbol of the crown. This is called predictive programming and revelation of the method. After all, who do you think has always had its hungry hands in the science cookie jar? The Royal Society, of course! As stated by the Royal Society, it is the “oldest scientific academy in continuous existence.” Ironically, its motto is Nullius in verba – take nobody’s word for it. Science disciplines over the past four decades have been preoccupied with the way concepts, values, and practices shape how we see ourselves in the world and the stories we tell ourselves. If these stories are taken for granted and never questioned then they tend to be reproduced over and over again. The social and scientific revolutions in modern, early modern, and even ancient ages have left their legacies with the modern mind and ultimately the ‘stories’ it unwittingly defaults to.
The biological, social, and economic crisis now upon us is as much a crisis of spirit as it is a crisis of power and control. Indeed we may see how the politics of human-nature relations relates to the politics of human knowledge systems. Increasingly we are questioning what an overly mechanistic and reductive logic obscures from view and how it conditions our knowledge. Other knowledges of Nature exist outside of a modern western philosophy, for example ones related to holistic science and practices by traditional cultures.
“Scientism today is doing what the church did in the fifteenth century: forcing theory to fit a predetermined metaphysics.”
―
Advances in science have allowed humans to manipulate, manage, interpret, document and indeed now literally create life with technology (with developments in synthetic biology). Science in its mechanistic form has revealed an ecological crisis, but the question of whether it is wholly equipped to reverse this crisis is doubtful. The solutions are social, cultural and economic, not just technical. This perspective doesn’t propose to undo science, yet asks that it is reflective of its own limits. It is equally crucial to pose challenges such as ‘how far’, ‘how fast’; ‘which way’, ‘who says’ and ‘why’; not a question of balancing a ‘pro’ and ‘anti’ position.
In 2015, member states of the United Nations adopted seventeen Sustainable Development Goals, an integrated program of 169 targets and 235 indicators ostensibly meant to achieve peace and prosperity by 2030. The question we need to be asking before we head down this road is whose prosperity and at what cost? People have been led to believe the purpose of these goals is to address poverty and avert climate catastrophe. On the surface, those are admirable goals. It is imperative that we address wealth inequality and begin to heal our planet. However, a little research into innovative finance, emerging technologies, and racialised power, and it becomes clear that there is more to the story than is being told in the media. Powerful interests are using the Sustainable Development Goals to mask their plans to remake the world as a digital panopticon. We, humanity, do not consent to this agenda of social entrepreneurship, greed, and technological authoritarianism. Its foundations are built on our nation’s history of racial capitalism, eugenics, and the rise of technocracy.
“Who do you listen to? Who influences your day-to-day decisions? Many of us are being led and misled away from our own thinking power.”
―
Ingenuity and reflexivity is important moving forward, since what is required is a radically new way of doing business, that elevates beyond the dystopian power grab of the century. We, humanity, must cocreate a way that honours and values life intrinsically (rather than financially). It is clear the financial game is rigged and not worth the paper it is printed on. We live in a world that is burning and flooding. People are resisting neoliberalism and structural adjustment in the streets, asserting their right to live in safety and with dignity. Indigenous peoples are putting their lives on the line to protect their lands, not only from government-backed corporate raiders but from supposedly “green” environmental NGOs advocating faux solutions that perpetuate violence against them. Solutions like the New Deal for Nature that, in the name of biodiversity, advocates creating protected areas that would remove human settlement from 30% of the planet – an outrageous theft of land from its original inhabitants!
We find ourselves on the doorstep of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, robots and algorithms poised to take over many jobs. The finance and technology sectors have converged. The world economy is dominated by the Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate (FIRE) sectors whose laser focus on short-term profit leaves only devastation in its wake. We’re seeing the rise of ubiquitous computing, surveillance, and crypto economics-virtual capitalism where digital assets are tracked on Blockchain. Philanthropy, credit, and global aid organisations have joined the Better Than Cash Alliance to push adoption of borderless electronic payment systems tied to biometrics. Their foot in the door? Government payments. It is an era of extreme wealth inequality, austerity, concentrated power, social unrest, militarisation, and environmental degradation. Not only have market-based solutions NOT delivered on their promise to fix the environment and eliminate poverty, the financiers’ “solutions” have made the problems worse. And the rich have a way of turning disasters into gold. Case in point: recently the World Economic Forum unleashed a manifesto in support of “stakeholder capitalism.” Benefit corporations to the rescue!
“The quest for absolute certainty is an immature, if not infantile, trait of thinking.”
―
It is the sustainability goals that will open the door to smart city infrastructure with facial recognition, cashless economies, big data analytics, and artificial intelligence used to implement broad threat assessments; the threat of natural disasters as well as threats posed by individual dissidents and groups. With advances in militarised predictive policing those contesting the status quo, or seeking to intervene on behalf of the people into the operations of global markets, can now be met with swift and possibly deadly countermeasures. What started out as a cost offset scheme for carbon trading has grown into a globalised cybernetic system, through which artificial intelligence (operating at the behest of debt finance) could eventually farm millions of people as domestic livestock data commodities. Remember all those chipped Swedes?
Moving forward everything will be assessed in terms of impact. Thanks to Mark Zuckerberg among others, the Trilateral Commission now has Pavlovian tools to tweak and nudge the masses as digital pawns, in real-time. It is at the point of “impact” that authoritarianism tightens its grip. So who gets to decide who or what will be impacted? Who exactly is going to come out ahead if we allow global investment markets to be built on disaster and misery? If those markets are profitable, we will only end up with MORE disaster and misery. Investors seek to increase the source of their profit, not eliminate it. This is extremely sick logic. Anyone who thinks we should be turning over control of society to the financial sector and the military, because they’re the ones to set the world straight about climate change, should revisit history.
Tech and defense interests have had the creation of a global augmented reality overlay in the works for decades. Once that coding hits a tipping point, “green” capitalists can impose rules using digital geo-fencing to advance their financial positions. In such a world everything will revolve around documenting “impact.” Everything will have a valuation and be subject to predictive analytics and risk profiling because that is what is needed for technocracy to run smoothly. Things that should never be tallied, like happiness, companionship, and the wonders of nature, will be factored into a giant balance sheet. The trial run for this was the Pokémon Go game. Niantic was bankrolled by In-Q-Tel, the venture capital arm of the CIA. If the deep state was looking for a test case to see if the public would embrace an augmented reality future, it seems they received a resounding YES, at least for the time being.
And yet…communities across the globe, people everywhere are starting to wake up and express concerns about the speed and trajectory of this program, particularly the installation 5G in their neighborhoods. 5G is the telecommunication infrastructure that will bring the Internet of Things to scale and usher in Fourth Industrial Revolution disruption. The World Economic Forum, Brookings Institution, Nokia, Ericsson, Huawei and the ITU (International Telecommunications Union), the United Nation’s agency for information and communications technology, are among those touting the importance of 5G and ICT (individual communication technology like cell phones and tablets) in accomplishing Sustainable Development Goals, especially education, health, gender equity and smart infrastructure.
“Perhaps it’s time to dumb down our “smart” life. We are being tracked, listened to, data mined, recorded, and so much more without our real knowing or understanding. When are we going to make a stand for our right to privacy? That’s Tremendo Bullship!”
―
In order for 5G to function properly, antennae must be installed 100-200 meters apart, which concentrates radiation exposure. Not only are the small cell installations eyesores, there are serious questions about potential negative health consequences related to electromagnetic field exposure. In 2015, scientists petitioned the United Nations to convene an independent working group to examine the pros and cons of the technology and suggest alternatives that would lower exposure to ELF (extremely low magnetic fields) and RF (radiofrequency radiation), but no action was taken. The petition with over 250 signatures from scientists from 43 countries was resubmitted last fall, as 5G transmitting elements began to be installed not only outside on lamp posts, but on buildings, and inside homes. Still no response.
What has happened to our world? Have people been converted, or ritually coronated, and possibly physically and mentally (and even spiritually) altered indefinitely? How often have you heard the religious mantra (trust the science, or alternatively, follow the science) touted over the past twenty-four months? We have observed interesting behaviour in most jabbed adults. They believe themselves to be woke through this obsession with what they believe to be “science.” They have been captured and herded into a new messianic mindset, in which their deliverance has come via a syringe, and the holy word dictated to them by the Biotech priests. This reality-distorting monopoly of fervent Scientism subjugates the populace into acceptance of policies and actions that brings them to genuflect to beg for these false prophets to literally and metaphorically call the shots – even if it may result in harm. This is what has become of our society.
“Science knows no boundary for those to whom it will serve.”
―
Whether we are aware of it or not, when we agree to have our lives linked to blockchain, we are agreeing to live in a behaviourist panopticon. In exchange for convenience and limited privileges, we give up our free will. The future being handed to us is one that will be shaped by surveillance, artificial intelligence, predictive analytics, machine learning, and feedback loops. We risk swapping our vibrant human spirits, beautiful in their passionate creativity and flawed vulnerability, for sanitised digital twins that will be managed as human capital by callous technocrats, to profit social impact investors. Before we walk through the door of digital identity, realise it opens onto a maze designed to disorient, confuse, and control us.
Consider a future of criminalised poverty where the threat of family separation is forever held over people’s heads to get them to comply with draconian edicts. The mass impoverishment being created by the global response to Covid is straight-up market-shaping for the Fourth Industrial Revolution economy that will run on social impact schemes. This is biocapitalism, coyly branded by the Davos crowd as stake-holder capitalism. The sources of data extraction fueling it will be education, healthcare, and housing services. Human behaviour, our relationships to one another and to the earth, will be calibrated against the UN’s Sustainability Goal metrics ensuring we’re “good” obedient citizens. The scope of our lives will be limited to the generation of harvestable “transparent” data that will profit sociopathic investors.
“Conquer your fears once and for all or continue to be conquered forever.”
―
The world needs YOU right now. The time has come for the leadership capacities we have within ourselves to step-up to the systemic challenges our social systems, communities, and organisations now face. Choose to become a “thinker” who is no longer indoctrinated by the control matrix feeding off of your pain and strife. Together we must cultivate a culture of gratitude, ceremony, community, and reciprocity – all grounded in a connection to the earth and the cosmos. This is the antidote to the mechanistic spirit eating of the tech-no-logic “green” capitalism monster. Acting now would kill the human capital bond market before 5G and wearable-tech shackles even get off the ground. We can make it so.
The times we are living and operating in are simultaneously deeply troubling yet deeply rewarding for those who are courageous enough to let go of the status quo logic so ingrained in how and why we do things and open up to the Logic of Life. In this way, we step into what it really means to be human. The more we – as leaders and change agents in our organisations – can become conscious of these living-system dynamics, the more we can enliven them. We have created an introduction to a new way of leading that values all of life. With clarity and brave hearts we can bring forth a new world. Either we commit to Life and heal or submit to the tech-no-logic matrix and lose our souls. Let us embrace one another as “thinking” human leaders, who dare write a different story. All of humanity, including the ancestors and the unborn are counting on us.
“Ignorance and apathy will eventually lead to the annihilation of humanity if left unchecked.”
―
Follow us on your favourite platform to receive daily updates. Not all platforms are created equal. Click on the ankh to make your selection and we’ll see you in the comments.
