Menu
This week’s announcement of the death of Queen Elizabeth II frees the world from British Admiralty Rule, kicks off Operation London Bridge and insures the eventual collapse of the Deep State Dark Cult regimen. From our perspective, the royal funeral will be interesting, not for all the pomp and ceremony, but because it will be one of the biggest gatherings of global power brokers in recent world history. However, now the world will be forced to watch hours of boring rhetoric from the new front man for the cult – the Climate Crisis King – Charles III, who owns several properties in Transylvania, Romania and is the heir to (Dracula) Vlad the Impaler’s bloodline. (Move along. Nothing to see here).
Not to be outdone, Darth Schwab came forward to call Critics of the ‘Great Reset’…a ‘Frivolous Fringe’ who he then instructed should ‘not talk about the World Economic Forum’. What’s the matter Klausie? Is the truth of your epic fail to reduce the planet’s population, enslave those remaining, and feed us all insects while merging us with the machine hive mind a little too much to bare? Still, there is Plan B (which is actually an extension Plan A). It’s all about taking the powers that nation states acquired through “covid” and applying them to “climate change”. That could mean “climate lockdowns”, or “climate passports”, rationing power or fuel, and even banning travel. Whatever terms or phrases they eventually use, it will finally make manifest some sick authoritarian fantasy. The global cult is intent on destroying Western society to create dependency and deprivation – thus control. Mind-controlled, woke ‘green’ fanatics screaming ‘climate change’ and an all pervasive corrupt media are key to helping them do it.
Since the earliest days of the fake “pandemic” there have been consistent (and ludicrous) attempts to associate “Covid” and “climate” in the public mind. They began by directly linking the two, and to this day, still do their best to make out that climate change will cause more zoonotic pandemics. Here’s the thing: even in the sleepiest of communities, that never really hit home. The more consistent and pervasive messaging has been an effort to rebrand “climate change”, not as an environmental problem but as a “public health” problem. In fact, this messaging first appeared in March 2020, when the pandemic was less than three months old. The cult-owned British Medical Journal published a paper titled “The WHO should declare climate change a public health emergency”. The argument spouted that global warming was far more dangerous than a simple virus, and should be treated just as seriously. Nobody really listened. In the two years since then, they drowned the airwaves with climate fear porn, but it never really lands.
“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.”
―
Just weeks into lockdown we were already being told that lockdowns were healing the planet, and cult-owned journalists were asking “if we can do this for covid, why not climate?”. By September of 2020 they were talking about “avoiding a climate lockdown”. In October 2020, wbcsd published an article on ‘Avoiding a Climate Lockdown’, stating that ‘under a “climate lockdown,” governments would limit private-vehicle use, ban consumption of red meat, and impose extreme energy-saving measures, while fossil-fuel companies would have to stop drilling.’ Check out it’s members here and be sure to avoid them in the future.
March of 2021 saw reports springing up claiming we needed a “covid lockdown every two years” to meet out climate goals. In June of 2021 and IPCC report prompted talk of “hinging from covid to climate” that never really took off. In March 2022, the think tank Public Policy Project repeated the demand that the WHO recognise climate change as a “public health emergency”. And now the BMJ is back at it, publishing two articles on the same topic. One warning about “The inconvenient truths of health and climate crises that can’t just be ignored” and another titled Groundhog day: the signs of a climate emergency are with us again.
“When you tear out a man’s tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you’re only telling the world that you fear what he might say.”
―
So it turns out the Great Barrier Reef is in better shape than ever, but that doesn’t fit the cult narrative. So, in August 2022, the Australian Academy of Sciences (AAS) made a disgraceful call for broadcast news and the internet to censor what it called “climate denialism misinformation” as well as “disinformation” about the Great Barrier Reef, Covid vaccines, and other issues that result in “societal harm”. It went on to call for all social media platforms to proactively promote “trusted information” to “inoculate” people against misinformation. Platforms should be “held accountable” for content that challenges the official narrative on any of these issues. According to the Australian climate writer Jo Nova, the head of the AAS is Anna-Maria Arabia, who spent five years advising local Labour politicians and has been calling for legislation to silence climate sceptics since 2011. Ms. Nova goes on to note: “Once upon a time the AAS had esteemed scientists. If there are any left they had better speak up while they still can.” She quotes the atmospheric physicist Professor Garth Paltridge, who said: “I just cannot understand how any science academy that is supposed to operate through rational debate can behave like this – that is, to use pure political brute force to prevent one side of the argument from putting its case.”
After decades of propaganda that saw “global warming” become “climate change” become “global heating” and eventually “climate emergency”, people are simply just not scared of it. Maybe it’s subconscious knowledge that it is a propaganda campaign, or perhaps it’s the last 60-years of failed prophecies, or maybe it’s because none of the real data supports the narrative. Whatever it is, people are simply not scared, not like they were of Covid anyway. The contollers have pretty much come right out to admit this themselves. A revealing Sky News article published this week, headlined: Why is it so hard to get people to care about climate change?”
“We are at war, and the enemy knows that the subconscious absorbs everything.”
―
During Covid, the UK government’s Nudge Unit – The Behavioural Insights Team – published a memo which said people were not scared enough of Covid, and the messaging needed to change in order to scare people into compliance. “The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging.” (how these people can sleep at night is beyond us). That same thinking holds with climate change. They want it to be the new covid, but to get there they need people to feel “an increased level of personal threat”. That means hitting the dangers of climate change hard. It means fudging death numbers and manufacturing alarming statistics. And it means peppering those headlines with influential figures – like Killary Clinton – calling climate change a “public health crisis”… but even that did not work. Incidentally, the headline ‘Vaccine Narrative Collapses as Harvard study Shows Jab More Dangerous Than Covid’ appeared in our newsfeed today.
Italy was officially the first country to start rationing energy after cutting their supply of Russian gas and oil. Until at least March 2023, public buildings across the nation will be banned from running air conditioning at lower than 25 degrees, or heating higher than 19 degrees. The plan, termed “Operation Thermostat” in the press, is being sold as a way for ordinary people to show “solidarity” with the people of Ukraine, with Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi saying: “Do we want to have peace or do we want to have the air conditioning on?” Just how adjusting your thermostat is going to achieve ‘peace’ is beyond us, but hey we’re living in the age of sentimental manipulation over reason, so go on – just believe!
“Mind easily mesmerised when frightened.”
―
The Guardian is illustrating the story with pro-peace artwork allegedly created by Italian school children (in English, for some reason). There is no talk yet of this kind of energy-rationing rule extending to private businesses or homes. However, a marker has now been set. Expect other nations to follow suit – lock step. Using the same tactics from Nazi Germany and the Covid plandemic, advertising banners have appeared all over Switzerland, asking “Is your neighbour heating his house above 19 degrees Celsius? Call us.” A reward of 200 francs is on offer for denouncing your neighbour for attempting to heat their own home.
Earlier this year it was reported that the Swiss government is considering imprisonment for up to three years for anyone who heats their rooms above 19 degrees Celsius. This message will go global because it is part of the agenda. Mainstream (mockingbird) Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma intend to back the narrative and announce the Central Bank Digital Currency (planned by the World Economic Forum and led by the new king) and Digital IDs. The only way they can survive is to seize everyone’s assets. That includes houses, cars, and businesses. “You will own nothing and you will be happy”…as long as you do exactly as they say.
As loving, caring, unsuspecting human beings, who wouldn’t want to live in a clean, green environment? Here’s the thing: powerful interests seek to misdirect people who want to do the right thing. If we go down the wrong path, irreversible harm will be inflicted in the name of “carbon trading,” “green” growth, “financial-inclusion,” and “resilient cities.” No one yet knows the health effects of children brought up on lab-grown meat and insects. In 2009 the UN advanced a Global Green Deal. The policy brief was prepared in the aftermath of the housing crisis with the intention of directing stimulus money into “green” economic activities managed through the World Bank, centering technology and innovative finance. 2009 was also the year the Global Impact Investment Network was founded, having been shepherded along by former University of Pennsylvania president Judith Rodin and the Rockefeller Foundation. It now has over 20,000 members.
Today, the United Nations Development Program is working in cooperation with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to set global standards for impact measurement that will drive investment, in part, into SDG projects. This effort, the Impact Management Project, has too many participants to list (2,000!) but includes Ronald Cohen’s Social Finance, Bain spin-off Bridgespan, and Larry Fink’s Blackrock, the largest asset manager in the world. Clearly there is an endless supply of money to throw at the environmental crisis, but only if profit can be readily captured for those who already have most of the resources. Capturing that profit means data, and in today’s world obtaining, storing, and processing that data comes with its own immense environmental consequences, and that is something few are eager to discuss.
“Our entire system, in an economic sense, is based on restriction. Scarcity and inefficiency are the movers of money; the more there is of any resource the less you can charge for it. The more problems there are, the more opportunities there are to make money. This reality is a social disease, for people can actually gain off the misery of others and the destruction of the environment.”
―
Seventeen goals were adopted by the 193 member states of the United Nations in 2015. The stated intention was to eliminate poverty and protect the planet. They essentially set the rules for the global hedge fund game that will run on data extracted from Internet of Things (IoT) sensors. There are two parallel programs of financialisation: #1 People as human capital and #2 Nature: carbon, energy, stormwater, etc. The sensor networks will be incorporated into smart city planning via programs of the type being hotly contested with Google’s Sidewalk Labs in Toronto.
You may be surprised to find out twelve of the goals are human-centric. So, there are a dozen different opportunities where data can be used control populations: education, employment, health, and housing to name a few. Only four of the sustainable development goals are, in fact, climate and energy-focused. The final goal deals with implementation: picture public-private partnerships with social impact financiers. These goals must be seen for what they are, an apparatus crafted by vulture philanthropists to maintain flows of transnational global capital at a time when growing wealth inequality and soaring inflation renders the purchasing power of the masses woefully inadequate.
Goals 4 and 8 also play into the results-oriented “evidence-based” techno-solutions being imposed on our education and training systems. Poverty and displacement from environmental, economic and political upheaval are and will continue to be, an immense humanitarian catastrophe. We must commit ourselves to caring for our neighbours, the land, and our non-human kin. We challenge anyone who has bought into this tripe to start to think for themselves instead of blindly following the heavily compromised parasitic puppets of the United Nations. We must denounce this enslavement and instead, bring new solutions that come from a place of truth, justice, and caring rather than data-driven opportunity engineering that is fundamentally dehumanising, disrespects the Earth, and flies in the face of community self-determination, ceding power to the tech-crazed cloud bosses.
“Courage doesn’t happen when you have all the answers. It happens when you are ready to face the questions you have been avoiding your whole life.”
―
We were wondering how long it would take for scientists (who weren’t cult-owned) to gather the courage and step forward, much like America’s Frontline Doctors did during the scamdemic. Sceptical scientists from around the world are flocking to sign the World Climate Declaration (WCD) that states there is no climate emergency. The WCD notes that climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound, self-critical science. Over 100 scientists and professionals have signed the Declaration since August 18th, 2022, when the Daily Sceptic highlighted the project and interest soared across social media. The WCD is particularly critical of climate models that provide the ‘evidence’ for most of the Net Zero agenda. “We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models,” says the WCD. Models have many shortcomings and “are not remotely plausible as global policy tools”, it adds. The WCD started with 500 signatories and has now grown to over 1,200. The lead author is the Norwegian physics Nobel Prize winner Professor Ivar Giaever.
There were zero named tropical storms or hurricanes between July 3 and August 30, which is the first time such a phenomenon has occurred in more than 80 years, forecasters noted this week. “It has been surprisingly and freakishly quiet in the Atlantic,” University of Miami hurricane researcher Brian McNoldy told The Associated Press this week. He pointed out that weak Tropical Storm Colin fizzled out on July 2 and there has literally been nothing else since. If we’re not careful, the outpouring of energy from well-intentioned climate marches could be channeled to dangerous ends. If we don’t take the reigns from the Davos crowd, instead of healing the planet they will end up incentivising things like monoculture genetically modified forests, Liquefied Natural Gas processing, and biometric monitoring of the poor. Worst case scenario: we end up in an eco-fascist police state where the masses are forced to live off meager Universal Basic Income (UBI) allotments and farmed for data like aphids milked by ants. People everywhere DO sense something is not right. There is a palpable feeling of anxiety in the air. While not everyone can pinpoint the source, a growing number of communities are on the right track, opposing the imposition of “smart” surveillance technologies and the incessant rollout of 5G networks needed to scale the coming Internet of Things (IoT), mixed-reality world. They need this infrastructure to capture the impact data for the financiers.
“The welfare state is the oldest con game in the world. First you take people’s money away quietly and then you give some of it back to them flamboyantly.”
―
Under the auspices of a climate emergency, one so many have unthinkingly demanded, the technocrats will have free reign to ensnare the earth in digital webs of sensors and EMF radiation. They will have our blessing to “count what matters” as the IXO Foundation video says. And count it they will in the most brutal, Orwellian ways. Given the present imbalance of power and growing militarisation of police, whose interests are going to be served through such a declaration? To us, it just sounds like an excuse for martial law. Elected officials clearly favour the interests of Google and Goldman Sachs over the people they are elected to serve.
In this pending augmented reality, digital surveillance future, each person will be expected to be an entrepreneur of the self, curating a digital brand and interacting with sensors in the world around us. Even our encounters with nature will be fed into some damn data channel to feed the AI beast. These sensors will monitor our behaviours and nudge us to make the “right choices,” so investors can achieve the success metrics that will allow them to siphon profit from the public trough. That’s what those dozen UN SDGs are really about. That is also the reason Ideas42 was developed out of Harvard – to leverage research in behavioural economics. They plan to force compliance in a world of precarious employment and environmental devastation. Behave or starve – technology as an enforcer. No love; just threats and fear. Behaviour change, or else! Here’s the thing: that change is always individual change, not the structural change that could lead to actual redistribution of resources and the healing that is needed.
“No one man can terrorise a whole nation unless we are all his accomplices.”
―
All choice is with you – always. Many attempts will be made by various physical and nonphysical beings to control and lock time in order to create fewer probable choices. The media plays out this control every day by producing the same fearful imagery and distorted ideas, intentionally programming your beliefs. You must learn to think for yourself. You are being challenged to recognise the programming of fear that is designed to break down individual psychological and spiritual strength in order to render you helpless and hopelessly confused. Look around. The choice is in front of you. The seasons change and so can you. Be receptive to the truth. You must have the faith to believe that you are the director of your experience, and if you really pay attention, you will see that your world is safe by your own creation. You must have the courage to see a bigger picture of reality and anchor in new solutions.
During these times of perceptual changes, you will be tested to strengthen your resolve and demonstrate your version of the power of the human spirit. While you are being adjusted by waveforms of energy that you cannot see, your body is being recircuited and fine-tuned to adapt to the accelerated energy. You select the codes best suited to your values and intentions. All realities occur concurrently, each one fortified by the power of thoughts and emotions invested in it. So, the all-important question comes down to, which program do you want to be a part of?
“And the turtles, of course…all the turtles are free, as turtles and, maybe, all creatures should be.”
―
Follow us on your favourite platform to receive daily updates. Not all platforms are created equal. Click on the ankh to make your selection and we’ll see you in the comments.
