Menu
With the targeted use of social and economic pressure, powerful global interests are attempting to make data surveillance and biohacking to “save” the planet the obligation of all “responsible” citizens. As we watch in horror while public health is weaponised as a tool of bio-surveillance and profit extraction, the motive becomes clear: profit will be created through human capital finance and the architecture of the surveillance it requires. The endgame seeks to control nature and the global poor as “human capital.” Masters of inversion will ultimately kill the Earth while pretending to “save” it. The world needs you right now to rise and refuse what is shaping up to be a dark and dystopian reality.
Will you allow them to put Internet of Things sensors on all the trees to “count what matters?” Will you stand by as they create self-owning cyborg forests? And what are the tech oligarchs’ plans for the global poor in this coming age, one defined by masses of surplus labour and automation? Where do you draw the line? What are you prepared to do to halt their plans? As AI intercedes in our lives in the most intimate and intrusive ways, will you give yourself over to the borg, adopt Blockchain identities, and allow transhumanist technocrats to control your every move? Right now, data is EVERYTHING, and digital identity ushered in with pandemic certificates or an orchestrated cyber security threat is the key to turning people into speculative investment commodities.
We are living through extraordinary times. It seems as if the world changed overnight, but in reality, it did not. As we chart a course forward, we must understand that the place in which we find ourselves is grounded in a long drawn-out agenda – all of it documented. Unless you have a clear understanding of biometric surveillance and human capital finance you will be tempted to dismiss valid serious concerns as “conspiracy.” And this is exactly what they want. They want you to believe in the benevolence of Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Marc Benioff, Pierre Omidyar, and god forbid even Michael Bloomberg. Do your best to resist the urge to lash out when people present facts that challenge your worldview. Instead, take the time to go to the source and use critical thinking to analyse the information for yourself. The world needs more Conscious Leaders who exercise muscles of intellectual discernment.
“Staying silent is like a slow-growing cancer to the soul and a trait of a true coward. There is nothing intelligent about not standing up for yourself. You may not win every battle. However, everyone will at least know what you stood for – YOU.”
―
People ask us how we know this stuff. To which we would say, we don’t know any more than the next guy, but we do know the enemy. And we have been watching and studying the enemy for decades to discover weakness and repetitive patterns. The enemy’s programs are cloaked in high purpose, sustainability and ‘saving the world’ song and dance but the real objectives are global governance and totalitarian control. For instance, the person who launched Agenda 21 was a Marxist, Maurice Strong. During the Iraq “oil for food” scam he allegedly stole $988,885 from his employer (the United Nations) but resigned from his position, fled to China, and was never convicted (red flag!). In fact, he surfaced with many of the usual parasites on the board of Chicago-based CCX, which was to be the legal monopoly that handled US Cap and Trade credits, pending the passing of legislation.
When researching, the code word to look for is “sustainability”, yet goals are expressed in more ominous words (e.g. “population control”). This was first detailed explicitly in the United Nation’s Agenda 21 (1992). Agenda 21 led to the Kyoto Protocol, and conferences in Johannesburg, Copenhagen, and Durban to advance its implementation at the local government level worldwide (check your local council website – it’s all there). The Club of Rome was organised in 1968 by the Morgenthau Group for the purpose of accelerating the plans to have the New World Order in place by the year 2000. To achieve this lofty goal, the Club of Rome developed a plan to divide the world into ten regions or kingdoms. This division centred upon an insidious assault on the reigning power of the United States of America. In 1976, the United States Association of the Club of Rome (USACOR) was formed for the purpose of shutting down the US economy gradually. Supreme parasite, Henry Kissinger was then (and still is) a leading agent in the service of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, a member of the Club of Rome and the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
―
The Club of Rome and its financiers, under the title of the German Marshall Fund, were two highly organised conspiratorial bodies operating under the cover of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). A majority of Club of Rome executives were drawn from NATO. The Club of Rome formulated all of what NATO claimed as its policies. The activities of the Committee of 300 members enabled Lord Carrington to split NATO into two factions – its former military alliance and a political (left-wing) power group. The Club of Rome is still one of the most important foreign policy arms of the Committee of 300, the other being the Bilderberger, (a secret group of parasitic international leaders who have regularly met together since 1954).
The Club of Rome’s foreign policy was put together in 1968 by hard-core members of the original J. Morgenthau group on the basis of a telephone call, made by the late Aurellia Peccei for a new and urgent drive to speed up the plans of the One World Government now called the New World Order. Peccei’s call was answered by the most subversive ‘future planners’ drawn from the United States, France, Sweden, Britain, Switzerland, and Japan. During the period 1968-72, the Club of Rome became a cohesive entity of new-science scientists, globalist future planners and internationalists of every stripe. Peccei’s book Human Quality formed the basis of the doctrine, concocted by NATO’s political wing. Peccei headed the Atlantic Institute’s Economic Council for three decades while he was the Chief Executive Officer for Giovanni Agnelli’s Fiat Motor Company. Agnelli, a member of an ancient Italian Black Nobility family of the same name, is one of the most notorious members of the Committee of 300. He has played a leading role in development projects in the Soviet Union.
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialised civilizations collapse?
Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”
– Maurice Strong
The Club of Rome is a conspiratorial umbrella organisation; a marriage between Anglo-American financiers and the Black Nobility families of Europe, particularly the so-called ‘nobility’ (thieves) of London, Venice, and Genoa. The key to the successful control of the world is their ability to create and manage savage economic recessions and eventually orchestrated depressions. The Committee of 300 looks to social convulsions on a global scale – followed by depressions – as a principal method of creating masses of people all over the world who will become welfare recipients in the future. The Committee appears to base much of its important decisions affecting humanity on the philosophy of Polish aristocrat Felix Dzerzinski who had very little respect for people, regarding them to be more on the level of cattle. As a close friend of British intelligence agent, Sydney Reilly, (Dzerzinski’s handler during the Bolshevik Revolution’s formative years) he often confided in Reilly on boozy nights. Dzerzinski was the hideous beast who ran the Red Terror apparatus in Russia. He once told Reilly, “Man is of no importance. Look at what happens when you starve him. He begins to eat his dead companions to stay alive. Man is only interested in his own survival. That is all that counts. All that Spinoza stuff is a lot of rubbish.”
Revolting snake, Harland Cleveland prepared a Club of Rome report with regard to the Third World. At the time, Cleveland was the US Ambassador to NATO. Disgracefully, the paper said it would be up to Third World nations to decide among themselves which populations should be eliminated. Based on the Cleveland Report, Peccei later wrote, “Damaged by conflicting policies of three major countries and blocs roughly patched up here and there, the existing international economic order is visibly coming apart at the seams. The prospect of the necessity of the recourse to triage deciding who must be saved is a very grim one indeed. But, if lamentable, events should come to such a pass, the right to make such decisions cannot be left to just a few nations because it would lend themselves to ominous power over the life of the world’s hungry.”
“The world is not overpopulated. That fallacy is perpetuated in all environmental research, policy, and planning including global warming and latterly climate change.”
— Dr. Tim Ball
Filthy little worm, Kissinger, played a major role in destabilising the United States by means of three wars – the Middle East, Korea and Vietnam. He is well known as is his role in the Gulf War, in which the US Army acted as mercenaries for the Committee of 300 in bringing Kuwait back into line and under its control. The opportunity to make an example out of Iraq so that other small nations would not be tempted to work out their own destiny was irresistible. The Club of Rome, acting on Committee of 300 orders to eliminate General ul Haq, had no compunction in sacrificing the lives of several US servicemen on board the flight, including a U.S. Army Defence Intelligence Agency group headed by Brigadier General Herbert Wassom. General ul Haq had been warned by the Turkish Secret Service not to travel by plane because he was targeted for a mid-air bombing. With this in mind, General ul Haq took the United States team with him as ‘an insurance policy.’ Here, he made a fatal error in underestimating the vile malevolence of the enemy.
The Club of Rome means One World Government, founded on a black death for democracy.
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome, as the real enemy is humanity itself.” ~ Club of Rome
The concept of sustainability was first brought to widespread public attention in a book by Peccei, entitled The Limits to Growth. He concluded that overpopulation, and increasing prosperity, would cause an ecological collapse within the next hundred years. This ideology was embraced by the Club of Rome and the Davos Forum in the early 1970s, and sold over 12 million copies in 37 languages. Twenty years later the Club of Rome published another bestseller, The First Global Revolution. It claimed: “Delay, in beginning corrective measures, will increase the damage to the world ecological system and reduce the human population that will be supportable. Democratic governments are far too short-sighted to deal with the ‘problematique’ and new forms of government are urgently required.” The assumptions and objectives in this book became the main structure of Agenda 21 – the master plan for the 21st Century. The global warming threat was confronted at Rio through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and creation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It was structured to predetermine scientific proof that human CO2 was one contribution of the “common enemy”.
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.“
– Timothy Wirth
The ‘science’ of climate change came to be “tortured until it fitted in with the narrative. Almost every aspect of the IPCC work is manipulated, selected, and controlled, to prove human CO2 is causing global warming. The objective was to prove the hypothesis, not to perform objective science. And the IPCC was very successful. Despite all the revelations about corrupted science and their failed predictions (projections) CO2 remains central to global attention about energy and environment. For example, several websites, many provided by governments, list CO2 output levels for new and used cars. Automobile companies work to build cars with lower CO2 output and, if for no other reason than to appear green and use it in their advertising. The automotive industry, which has the scientists to know better, collectively surrenders to eco-bullying about CO2. They are not alone. They get away with it because they pass on the unnecessary costs to a befuddled “trying to do the right thing” population. The Club of Rome published a joint communique on its website from a ‘planning retreat’ with 150 senior UNESCO officials prior to a G8 meeting which declared:
“We are at the end of an era – a turning point in history. We underline the urgency of radical action to avert the impending risk of catastrophic climate change, and to stress to political leaders that the overriding challenge is to avert the impending risk of catastrophic climate change. Democracy is not the panacea. It could not organise everything and is unaware of its own limits.
“When we allow science to become political then we are lost.
We will enter the internet version of the Dark Ages, an era of stifling fears and wild prejudices,
transmitted to people who don’t know any better.”
–Michael Crichton
The US Census Bureau provides a running estimate of world population. It was 6,994,551,619 on 15 February, 2012. On 30 October, 2011 the UN claimed it passed 7 billion; the difference is 5,448,381. This is more than the population of 129 countries of the 242 listed by Wikipedia. It confirms that most statistics are crude estimates, especially those of the heavily compromised UN which supposedly relies on individual member countries, yet no accurate census exists for any of them. Population density is a more meaningful measure. Most people are concentrated in coastal flood plains and deltas, which are about 5 percent of the land. Compare Canada, the second largest country in the world with approximately 35.3 million residents estimated in 2013 with California where an estimated 37.3 million people lived in 2010. Some illustrate the insignificance of the density issue by putting everyone in a known region. However, fitting all the people of the world in an area is different from them being able to live there. Most of the world is completely unoccupied by human beings… but that doesn’t fit the narrative.
“When people learn no tools of judgment and merely follow their hopes, the seeds of political manipulation are sown.”
–Stephen Jay Gould
In 2009, the Budapest branch of the Club of Rome (members include the parasitic scourge that is George Soros) declared a State of Global Emergency as ‘we only have 4 or 5 years to prevent a total collapse of the Earth’s eco-systems.’ The Club of Rome preaches that democracy, as a failure, must be doomed. Its bombastic utterances are:
The Club of Rome ghouls believe that a small window of opportunity exists to transform humanity under a global government and the Green Parties are among their arsenal. “Democracy is not a panacea. It is unaware of its own limits. The fact must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is not suited for the tasks ahead. The very complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow of its representatives to make competent decisions at the right time.” Here’s the thing: temperatures have not risen for at least 15 years. The pause now threatens to expose how so many scientists sold their souls for cash and fame.
“Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it.
Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumoured by many.
Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books.
Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders.
Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations.
But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.”
–Hindu Prince Gautama Siddharta
Conscious Leaders are committed to helping people understand the world and the way it works. Lack of understanding allows those with a political agenda (or worse) to exploit people. Without understanding natural processes you cannot identify human-induced changes. You are vulnerable to the claim that all natural changes are unnatural, which is occurring daily in the mainstream media. When you are not in touch with your truth, it’s much harder to spot the fallacy. Follow the money, follow power. Accept that there are a few evil scumbags in this world. Recognise that people are paid to lie and cheat everyday. Know that technology, finance, and military interests are at the centre of it all. Fight for as much clarity as you can get, and grow your network.
We are living in murky times. This path ends in pension funds being poured into outcomes-based, “pay-for-success” contracts that rely on data from sensors to prove the “success” of the deals. No one is talking about the fact that the rare metals in those sensors are mined by child slave labour in Congo or will require 5G. The EMF radiation from 5G may very well kill off invertebrate populations, including our vital pollinators. No one is talking about e-waste. No one is talking about how there is not enough lithium or cobalt in the world to replace electric vehicle batteries every 10-years. Net zero will unleash untold misery on human society by ruining all power infrastructure while having nothing to replace it. Yet, corrupt and heavily compromised government officals are moving in Lock Step with this insane ideology. In 2015, member states of the United Nations adopted seventeen Sustainable Development Goals, an integrated program of 169 targets and 235 indicators ostensibly meant to achieve peace and prosperity by 2030. The question we need to be asking before we head any further down this road is whose prosperity and at what cost?
“Few things are so deadly as a misguided sense of compassion.”
– Charles Colson
The Commonwealth Bank in Australia is either on board and actively pushing for this dystopian future or virtue signalling to their masters. Comm Bank has quietly added a new feature to its online banking software that tells customers their carbon footprint based on monthly spending. The move follows a partnership between the bank and CoGo, a company that provides carbon footprint management solutions. According to the bank, the national average of carbon emitted is 1,280 kilograms, while a sustainable figure is 200. The bank has provided the option to “pay a fee” for being a disgusting human being, going about your human business of breathing and eating on your own planet. Right now it’s an option to offset the carbon footprint (like anyone would actually elect to pay more for what they have already paid for – to a bank!) Make no mistake: this is the Social Credit system slipping in through the backdoor. What happens when they choose to make this mandatory on all transactions? According to one of the banks’ executives, that’s the plan!
CommBank Group executive Angus Sullivan confirmed the service would eventually advise customers about the carbon footprint for every transaction they made. One Nation MP, Mark Latham slammed the bank’s antics, “If they are so worried about dead trees as a result of bank spending why are these imbeciles running a bank at all?” We would be inclined to agree. Carbon footprint is food for trees. Carbon emitted does not cut down trees. This is inversion and propaganda double-speak at its most pathetic. Let’s say you’re environmentally conscious and want to fly. Enter carbon offsetting: for the price of a coffee you can pay some third-world farmer to quit burning coal, or some random company to plant enough trees to cancel out the emissions from your trip. If it sounds too good to be true, that’s because it is!
The whole practice of carbon offsetting is so fundamentally flawed that eco-writer, George Monbiot, compared it to pushing food around your plate “to create the impression you have eaten it.” The numbers simply don’t add up: if we in the West decided to offset even fifty percent of our emissions targets, developing nations would have to magically start emitting negative amounts of carbon. Commercial offsetting is no better; investigations routinely find companies fudging their figures, or outright lying. With no industry standard, there’s nothing to measure improvements against; meaning companies can claim whatever they like.
“Suggesting that renewables will let us phase rapidly off fossil fuels
in the United States, China, India, or the world as a whole
is almost the equivalent of believing in the Easter Bunny and Tooth Fairy.”
– James Hansen
A new DC Leaks dump revealed that billionaire cockroach, George Soros, bribed former Vice President Al Gore with millions of dollars to fabricate data about global warming. Soros used his Open Society Institute to pay Gore $10 million dollars per year in order to cook up claims about man-made climate change and sell it to the public. The leaked OSI memo reads “There has been a budget of $11 million for global warming grants in the US Programs budget for the last several years. This budget item captures George Soros’s commitment of $10 million per year for three years to Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection, which conducts public education on the climate issue in pursuit of creating political space for aggressive US action, in line with what scientists say is necessary to put our nation on a path to reducing its outsize carbon dioxide emissions.”
Net Zero Watch reported “Acute food shortages were feared last night after high gas prices forced most of Britain’s commercial production of carbon dioxide to shut down. The closure of two fertiliser plants in northern England and others in Europe has left the food and drink industry facing a shortage of carbon dioxide, which is a by-product of fertiliser manufacturing. The gas is critical to the production and transport of a range of products, from meat to bread, beer and fizzy drinks.” The twisted irony of climate wokeism is here on full display; a shortage of life-sustaining CO2 caused by extremist climate policies that aim to ‘eliminate’ life-sustaining CO2 in the form of cheap, reliable energy! Not to mention the hard reality of the swift, tangible and disastrous effects to society of constantly ‘bending the knee’ to the anti-human climate lobby, also on full display.
The food wars are red hot — and now even the mainstream is starting to pay attention. Even as the fires and explosions destroying our food supply are broadly reported, the FBI is warning of cyberattacks on farming infrastructure. Iran is set to be the first country to roll out a food rationing scheme based on new biometric IDs. Where vaccine passports failed, food passports will now be eagerly accepted by hungry people who can’t afford rapidly inflating food prices. This is the sick realisation of the longstanding agenda by the billionaire class to, as Kissinger put it, “control the food; control the people.”
The video below, from the Clear Energy Alliance is excellent in pointing out the malevolent intentions, sinister mechanisms, and poverty-stricken outcomes of the proposed Carbon Tax. Of course, we have all been hearing about the virtues of a carbon tax. Some even have the gall to call it a “dividend”. Don’t be fooled by the inversion and notorious parasitic double-speak. A tax on carbon is a terrible idea and here’s Mark Mathis to explain exactly why.
“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false-front for the urge to rule it.”
– H.L. Mencken
We live in an era of extreme wealth inequality, austerity, concentrated power, social unrest, militarisation, and environmental degradation. Not only have market-based solutions NOT delivered on their promise to fix the environment and eliminate poverty, the financiers’ “solutions” have made the problems worse. And we all know the rich have a way of turning disasters into gold, which means we cannot rely on them to solve anything. Case in point, the World Economic Forum unleashed a manifesto in support of “stakeholder capitalism.” Benefit corporations to the rescue! Financiers are going to claim they’re doing positive things with their portfolios by configuring asset allocations to align with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance), and that’s where the UN Sustainable Development Goals come in. It’s also worth noting that many faith communities have large endowments where investments are likely to be ESG aligned. Just because it says ESG doesn’t mean it actually represents the values of your faith.
It is the sustainability goals that will open the door to smart city infrastructure with facial recognition, cashless economies, big data analytics, and artificial intelligence used to implement broad threat assessments – the threat of natural disasters as well as threats posed by individual dissidents and groups. With advances in militarised predictive policing those contesting the status quo, or seeking to intervene on behalf of the people into the operations of global markets, can now be met with swift and possibly deadly countermeasures. What started out as a cost offset scheme for carbon trading has grown into a globalised cybernetic system through which artificial intelligence (operating at the behest of debt finance) could eventually farm millions of people as domestic livestock data commodities – Dzerzinski’s wet dream made manifest.
“What gets us into trouble is not what we don’t know, it’s what we know for sure that just ain’t so.”
– Mark Twain
People have been led to believe the purpose of these global goals is to address poverty and avert climate catastrophe. While those sound like admirable goals, the sordid history and twisted belief-system of the groups pushing this agenda tell us otherwise. It is imperative that we address wealth inequality and begin to heal our planet. But there is more to the story than is being told by the cult-owned mockingbird media. Powerful interests are using the Sustainable Development Goals to mask their plans to remake the world as a digital panopticon. What follows is a nightmare of social entrepreneurship, greed, and technological authoritarianism. Its foundations are built on a global history of racial capitalism, eugenics, and the rise of technocracy. What is a zero-carbon future? What does it look like? To imagine, turn off your heater. No airports. No shipping. No animals. Perfect surveillance state. This Ice Age Farmer report breaks down the “Absolute Zero” plan and how governments are already actively taking drastic steps every day to meet these dystopian goals for Travel, Transport, Energy, Manufacturing, Recycling, and Food. We must understand the reality underneath their flowery philanthropic language: Absolute Slavery.
We, humanity, now understand their stated goals: a Transhumanist future of bio-engineered tiny humans (with tiny carbon footprints, of course!). Those tiny humans are to be fed edible vaccines in fake food, unable to eat real meat. Only by understanding how extreme this agenda we are facing is, can Conscious Leaders fully appreciate the extent of the crisis the controllers are manufacturing to achieve that agenda — and the urgency with which we must fight it. Conscious Leaders will not stand idle while Big Tech restructures entire neighbourhoods and rebuilds urban centres as carbon-neutral, digital surveillance panopticons called ‘smart cities’ under the benevolent guise of environmental sustainability and public health, as part of the UN Agenda 2030. We see the narrative framing of urban planning ordinances and statutes so that cities are controlled by cloud-based applications and embedded sensor networks which can predict the behaviour of entire populations. We do not consent to the scanning copious volumes of data for behavioural patterns and real-time tracking of citizens. We will not legitimise the eco-propaganda of ‘green’ capitalists by feeding mass fears owing to human activity. If we allow fear and hysteria to be weaponised against us, it will simply fog our perception of events and break our grasp on reality. We are currently on the precipice between freedom and serfdom and it is the responsibility of anyone with a conscience to expose the dystopia into which many are sleepwalking.
Forewarned is forearmed.
“If a private enterprise is a failure, it closes down – unless it can get a government subsidy to keep it going; if a government enterprise fails, it is expanded. I challenge you to find exceptions.”
— Milton Friedman
Follow us on your favourite platform to receive daily updates. Not all platforms are created equal. Click on the ankh to make your selection and we’ll see you in the comments.
